Skip to content

Technical library

Checklists, criteria, and operating questions

A technical index for reviewing inspections, references, and answers without losing the thread.

Open only the record you need: every technical detail remains available in its relevant sheet.

Checklists

Operational checklist tables

Operational references for inspections and checks.

CS / 01Textile slings and complex sling assemblies

  • EN 1492-1 - Flat woven webbing slings made of man-made fibres
  • EN 1492-2 - Roundslings made of man-made fibres
  • EN 1677 - Alloy steel components for slings, grade 8 and 10

Identification tag present

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Label present, readable, correct data
Discard criterion
Missing or unreadable

Webbing integrity: surface abrasion

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No deep abrasion
Discard criterion
Evident or localised abrasion

Presence of cuts, including small cuts

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No cuts or interrupted fibres
Discard criterion
Cuts or tears present

Chemical or heat alteration

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No alteration, rigidity, or odours
Discard criterion
Clear chemical or thermal attack

Outer sleeve integrity for roundslings

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Continuous and intact sleeve
Discard criterion
Damaged or missing sleeve

Stitching integrity

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Complete and regular stitching
Discard criterion
Missing, loose, or broken stitching

Unauthorised repairs

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No non-original repairs
Discard criterion
Artisanal stitching or modifications

Metal accessory assembly

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Accessories correctly mounted and solid
Discard criterion
Wrong or loose accessories

CE marking and accessory grade

Method
Visual / documentary
Acceptance criterion
Present and readable, grade 80/100
Discard criterion
Missing or unreadable

Suspension ring wear

Method
Caliper measurement
Acceptance criterion
Thickness reduction <10%
Discard criterion
Reduction >=10%

Terminal hook wear

Method
Caliper measurement
Acceptance criterion
Thickness reduction <10%
Discard criterion
Reduction >=10%

Locking system function

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Regular operation
Discard criterion
Blocked or damaged system

Operational notes

  • Slings that fail even one criterion must be withdrawn from service and identified as non-conforming.
  • Results must be reported in writing; Cruscotto™ digitally organizes reports, evidence, and inspection history.

CS / 02Wire-rope slings

  • UNI ISO 4309:2019 - Wire ropes inspection, maintenance, and discard
  • EN 1677-1 - Forged components for slings, grade 8
  • EN 1677-2 - Hooks with latch, grade 8
  • EN 1677-3 - Self-locking hooks, grade 8
  • EN 1677-4 - Master links, grade 8

Identification tag

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Present, readable, data consistent with CE certificate
Reference standard
UNI ISO 4309:2019

Rope surface condition

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Intact surface, no deep corrosion or covering paint
Reference standard
UNI ISO 4309:2019

Broken wires

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Broken wires within limits defined by the standard for the rope construction
Reference standard
UNI ISO 4309:2019

Permanent deformation

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No birdcaging, bottleneck deformation, or rigid kinks
Reference standard
UNI ISO 4309:2019

Suspension ring wear

Method
Caliper
Acceptance criterion
Thickness reduction <10% compared with original
Reference standard
EN 1677-4

Accessory assembly

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Components correctly mounted, with no play or defects
Reference standard
EN 1677-1

Terminal accessory integrity

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No cracks, crushing, notches, or abusive markings
Reference standard
EN 1677-2 / EN 1677-3

Terminal hook wear

Method
Caliper
Acceptance criterion
Thickness reduction <10% and regular geometry
Reference standard
EN 1677-2 / EN 1677-3

Locking system function

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Automatic closure working, without friction or excessive play
Reference standard
EN 1677-2 / EN 1677-3

Bolts, nuts, shackles

Method
Visual + caliper
Acceptance criterion
Intact threads, tightened components, no evident wear
Reference standard
EN 1677-1

Operational notes

  • Wire-rope slings that fail even one criterion must be withdrawn from service and identified as non-conforming.
  • Results must be reported in writing; Cruscotto™ digitally organizes reports, evidence, and inspection history.

CS / 03Permanent lifting magnets

  • UNI EN 13155:2021 - Removable load lifting attachments
  • Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC
  • INAIL guidelines - Lifting appliances
  • Manufacturer technical manuals

Identification plates: CE, capacity, serial number

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Present on both sides, readable and complete data
Reference standard
EN 13155 §7.2

Polar surface cleaning

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No oil, grease, dust, or filings
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.4

Polar surface condition

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Smooth surfaces, no cracks or excessive wear
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.4

Rotation shaft movement

Method
Manual
Acceptance criterion
Smooth movement, no jerks or blocking
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.4

External body condition

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No deformation, notch, or visible damage
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.2

Activation lever function

Method
Functional test
Acceptance criterion
Regular movement, no excessive play
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.4

Safety mechanism function

Method
Functional test
Acceptance criterion
Mechanical lock active in ON position, manually releasable only
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.4

Operational notes

  • Permanent magnets that fail even one criterion must be withdrawn from service and identified as non-conforming.
  • Results must be reported in writing; Cruscotto™ digitally organizes reports, evidence, and inspection history.

CS / 04Plate lifting clamps

  • UNI EN 13155:2021 - Cranes, removable load lifting attachments
  • INAIL guidelines - Lifting equipment inspections
  • Manufacturer user manuals

CE marking

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Present, readable, conforming
Reference standard
EN 13155 §7.2

Capacity, serial number, manufacturer

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Readable, complete data consistent with manual
Reference standard
EN 13155 §7.2

Structural integrity: body

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No visible crack, impact, or deformation
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.2

Surface condition

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No active corrosion or covering paint
Reference standard
INAIL guidelines

Segment-ring movement: clamp open

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Smooth movement, no friction or blocking
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.3

Connecting pin wear

Method
Visual + caliper
Acceptance criterion
Wear <=10% compared with original diameter
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.3

Locking lever wear

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Lever not deformed, no abnormal play
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.3

Spring function

Method
Manual test
Acceptance criterion
Resistance present under pressure on ring with lever closed
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.3

Toothed sector wear

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Teeth clean, not damaged or deformed
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.3

Safety locking system

Method
Functional test
Acceptance criterion
Works correctly and activates during gripping
Reference standard
EN 13155 §5.3

Connected accessories: shackles and links

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Intact, marked, correctly installed
Reference standard
EN 1677

Lubrication

Method
Manual check
Acceptance criterion
Applied where required by manual
Reference standard
INAIL guidelines

Annual inspection

Method
Authorised technician
Acceptance criterion
Certified disassembly, inspection, and reassembly
Reference standard
Manufacturer manual

Operational notes

  • Plate lifting clamps that fail even one criterion must be withdrawn from service and identified as non-conforming.
  • Results must be reported in writing; Cruscotto™ digitally organizes reports, evidence, and inspection history.

CS / 05Chain hoists

  • UNI EN 13157 - Cranes, hand-powered lifting equipment
  • ISO 7592 - Chains for hand-operated chain hoists
  • Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC
  • D.Lgs. 81/2008 - Annex VI
  • INAIL guidelines - Lifting equipment inspections

CE marking

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Present, readable, conforming
Reference standard
Directive 2006/42/EC

Capacity, serial number, manufacturer

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Readable, complete data consistent with manual
Reference standard
EN 13157 §7.2

Hoist body integrity

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No deformation or structural damage
Reference standard
EN 13157 §5.2

Surface condition

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No deep corrosion or covering paint
Reference standard
INAIL

Upper/lower hooks

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Intact, latches working, no deformation
Reference standard
EN 13157 §5.3

Safety and anti-derailing devices

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
Present, correctly mounted, intact
Reference standard
EN 13157 §5.3

Brake, lock, end-stop function

Method
Manual test
Acceptance criterion
Smooth operation and secure engagement
Reference standard
EN 13157 §5.3

Load chain integrity

Method
Visual
Acceptance criterion
No visible defect, crushing, or cut
Reference standard
EN 13157 Annex C

Chain elongation

Method
Measure / comparison
Acceptance criterion
<=2% versus nominal length
Reference standard
EN 13157 Annex C

Link diameter reduction

Method
Caliper
Acceptance criterion
<=5% versus nominal value
Reference standard
ISO 7592

Pins, bolts, rings wear

Method
Visual + caliper
Acceptance criterion
No excessive play or visible wear
Reference standard
INAIL

Lubrication

Method
Manual check
Acceptance criterion
Chain lubricated, moving components greased
Reference standard
EN 13157 / Manufacturer manual

Operational notes

  • Chain hoists that fail even one criterion must be withdrawn from service and identified as non-conforming.
  • Results must be reported in writing; Cruscotto™ digitally organizes reports, evidence, and inspection history.

CS / 06Chain slings

  • EN 818-2 - Grade 8 chains for slings
  • EN 1677-1 - Forged components for slings, grade 8
  • EN 1677-2 - Hooks with latch, grade 8
  • EN 1677-3 - Self-locking hooks, grade 8
  • EN 1677-4 - Master links, grade 8
  • EN 818-4 - Grade 8 chain slings - Safety

Identification

Included checks
Markings, tag, capacity, number of legs, class, and manufacturer data
Method
Visual / documentary
References
EN 818-4, EN 1677

Chain

Included checks
Deformed links, cuts, crushing, corrosion, elongation, and wear
Method
Visual + caliper
References
EN 818-2

Accessories

Included checks
Master links, joining links, shortening hooks, shackles, and connections
Method
Visual
References
EN 1677-1, EN 1677-4

Hooks

Included checks
Integrity, opening, latches, self-locking hooks, and safety devices
Method
Visual + functional
References
EN 1677-2, EN 1677-3

Outcome

Included checks
Conforming equipment identification or withdrawal from service if non-conforming
Method
Cruscotto™ report
References
D.Lgs 81/08

Operational notes

  • This table is a demonstration summary of the document family and does not replace the complete operating sheet.

CS / 07Test bench for lifting components

  • D.Lgs 81/08 - equipment inspection and maintenance
  • Control Service internal procedures
  • Manufacturer specifications or applicable technical reference
  • EN/ISO references to confirm by component

Identification

Activity
Review markings, serial number or internal code, rated capacity, and available documents
Method
Visual / documentary
Output
Component identified and linkable to the report

Compatibility

Activity
Assess dimensions, attachment points, clearances, and fixture feasibility on the bench
Method
Technical / operational
Output
Test feasibility confirmed or limit to clarify

Setup

Activity
Positioning, restraint, and safe fixture setup of the component on the test bench
Method
Controlled fixture setup
Output
Component ready for testing

Execution

Activity
Apply load or force against the agreed parameter, procedure, or applicable indication
Method
Test bench
Output
Values and behaviour observed

Post-test check

Activity
Check for visible anomalies, play, evident deformation, or conditions to report
Method
Visual / functional
Output
Technical observations recorded

Validated outcome

Activity
Result summary, operating notes, useful evidence, and expert technician validation
Method
Cruscotto™ report
Output
Documentation ready for technical review

Operational notes

  • The test bench supports the inspection with a documented functional outcome; it does not replace statutory inspections required by applicable regulations.
  • Parameters, fixture setup, and test limits depend on the component, available documentation, and approved technical reference.

FAQ

Operating questions, by topic

Inspection preparation

01What is needed to prepare an inspection?

Equipment families, indicative quantities, available codes, departments, operating windows, and existing documentation.

Outcomes and traceability

01What is recorded in Cruscotto™?

Outcomes, equipment references, photos when useful, attachments, history, registers, and follow-up notes.

02What happens when a non-conformity is found?

The finding is documented, linked to the equipment item, and shared with the responsible contact for management, identification, or segregation.

03Why is equipment identification important?

It links inspections, photos, outcomes, history, and deadlines to the individual equipment item.

Responsible sharing

01Can Cruscotto™ screenshots be used in presentations?

Yes, if recreated and anonymized: real customer data, codes, reports, QR codes, URLs, and operating references must not appear.